Out of Africa

Out Of Africa, 1985
Directed by Sydney Pollack
Nominated for 11 Oscars, Won 7
Wins Include: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Cinematography, Best Art-Set Direction, Best Sound, Best Original Score

Out of Africa tells the story of Danish Baroness, Karen Blixen. Karen has married for convenience. She married a friend, both of whom want to travel and see the world. Before they wed, they arrive in Kenya to start a plantation. While originally supposed to be a cattle farm, but, Karen discovers upon arrival, they will now have a coffee plantation. Karen and Bror wed upon Karen's arrival, though neither love each other. At first unused to the society and culture, Karen is soon throwing herself into her work and responsibilities. These grow even more so when the First World War breaks out, and many of the men go off to war. While her husband is gone, she continues to run into Denys, a local hunter, whom she develops a close friendship with, while problems grow on the farm. Soon, when the men come back from war, Karen and Bror are growing more and more independent, leaving more room for the farm, various other projects and for Denys and Karen to grow together. 

I really love Meryl Streep and Robert Redford. So I really did want to love this movie. Robert Redford has always been so underrated. And while he didn't blow me away or anything in this film, he still did such a solid job and it's sad to see it go unnoticed. Meryl Streep on the other hand, seemed to rock the role of Karen Blixen. Surprising? Not really. But other than that, this film was pretty bland. 

The film seemed to be a cross between Gone With the Wind and the English Patient. I enjoyed Gone With the Wind, but didn't really enjoy the English Patient much. There wasn't too much of a solid story, but more just "the life of Karen Blixen". While "the story of" works for some films, this one was a little too slow and bland for it to be a truly exciting film. This seemed to have potential (between Pollack, Streep and Redford), but it just was too slow and a little too boring. 

However, the film was really gorgeous. There's a reason this won cinematography and art/set direction. The backdrop of the film is beautiful already, but the cinematography really captures the beauty of the country and brings it to life. However, it wasn't enough to revive this slow film. 

Like I said, I really wanted to enjoy it, but I didn't really. Like American Hustle, solid performances aren't enough to carry a film if the story and narrative isn't there. And it really wasn't here for this one. 

Acting- 8.5/10 
Screenplay- 6/10 
Directing- 7/10 
Visuals- 8.5/10 
Music- 7.5/10 
Rewatchability- 4/10 
Emotional Connection 5/10 
Entertaining- 5/10 
Enjoyment- 5.5/10 
"Total Package"- 6.5/10       

Total: 63.5/100

Her

Her, 2013
Directed by Spike Jonze
Nominated for 5 Oscars, Including Best Picture

Theodore Twobly is lonely. Living in the not-so-distant future, he works at a letter writing company, and spends his time playing video games and plugged into his OS, a small ear piece which reads out his emails, the news, etc. Through his OS he has access to everything and anything. He is also in the stages of getting a divorce. One he doesn't really want. However, a new version, OS1, has just been released and it's the first artificial intelligent OS. Upon set-up, he gets quizzed and selects that he would like a woman's voice for his OS. And there he meets Samantha. Samantha, his new, artificially intelligent OS, is funny, vivacious and curious about Theodore's world and Theodore is instantly drawn in. While hesitant at first, Theodore finds Samantha a great companion, especially because he's so lonely. And as they spend more and more time together, talking, etc, they find themselves falling in love.

Her is definitely a movie for my generation and age group it seems. Theodore lives in a pretty hipster world where everyone seems to have some sort of really artsy job, all the men have mustaches, and are all connected to their OS's. Admittedly, the movie had a few very explicit scenes that the movie could've done without. This, I thought, was a large fault of the movie. They were uncomfortable to watch/listen to, and I felt the film could've done without (I'm speaking to you, adult chatroom dead cat choking scene).

However, the world building for this film really was in depth and incredible. The details were all there and it made everything seem a lot more realistic without seeming ridiculous. A man falling in love with his OS could've been really lame and ridiculous but the way Spike Jonze handled the world, the relationship and the characters really avoided that.

Not that I've seen much of Joaquin Phoenix's body of work, but this seems like an extremely different role for him. He really was quite exceptional as Theodore, and really conveyed his sadness, his loneliness, and his want to just be happy. As well, Scarlett Johansson did some great voice work as Samantha. It really felt like Samantha was there in the room with Theodore. As well, I really enjoyed Amy Adams in this as well. I really loved his curly-haired hipster look, it was super cute. I kind of wish I looked like that actually.

But what the film did most was ask us questions. And a lot of them, whether we know it or not. What makes a relationship a relationship? Does it have to be 2 people? Is it bodies? Or sex? Or connecting with someone's personality? Or just talking? Theodore goes through all these questions. He has people who are happy for him upon hearing who his new girlfriend is, and then he has other people, his ex-wife for instance, that tell him he's crazy, and that he was never good at relationships, and being in one with a computer must be perfect for him. But then there's Amy, who just tells him to do what makes him happy.

In the end, we are left contemplating what constitutes a real relationship, in a world where technology is everywhere. Can technology really fulfill us and make us truly happy? In the end, no, it doesn't, not truly anyway. Maybe temporarily, but not forever.

But the film also doesn't give us really clear answers. We see Theodore's several different relationships. We have him and Samantha, we see snapshots of him and Catherine (his ex wife), and him and Amy. All very different, but all definitely trying to say something about relationships. And all of them require communication, and in the end, maybe that's what a relationship needs. Trust, loyalty and communication.

Overall, the film was exquisitely beautiful. The cinematography was gorgeous, really capturing both LA and Shanghai as beautiful and futuristic. And I'm adoring the fact that this is getting so much screenplay love. Especially over American Hustle. The world building in this film was incredible and so dedicated. And Theodore is such a complex and lonely character, and all the women shown all have different messages to give us about relationships. While I felt Samantha was a little too human (then again, we're not used to AI OS's), Theodore was a very rich character and you really felt his pain and loneliness. Did he remind anyone else of Lennard from Big Bang Theory? Just Me?

Anyway, I loved the film, but the only thing that draws me back from loving it more is the explicit scenes which were uncomfortable and unnecessary. Other than that, it's a film that asks questions, makes you think, but is also well-written and beautiful.

8.5/10

Nebraska

Last weekend, my local $5 theater got the movies Nebraska and Her. My husband was away for the weekend, so I decided to catch the double feature (perfectly timed so I could see them back to back!), as these were 2 Best Picture Nominees I hadn't seen yet.

Personally, I was much more excited to Her than Nebraska. Nebraska looked pretty boring to me, and, even though I really enjoyed the Descendants, I wasn't too enthused. Her, on the other hand, is a movie that seems to have been appealing to people my age (And tumblr) so I was looking forward to seeing it very much! So I'll do rmy review for Nebraska here, and do a separate one for Her

Nebraska, 2013
Directed by Alexander Payne
Nominated for 6 Oscars, Including Best Picture

Woody Grant has won a million dollars! Or, at least that's what the flyer in the mail tells him. Woody, old, drunk, and a little forgetful, is determined to go leave his home in Billings, Montana and collect his winnings in Lincoln, Nebraska. At first, Woody sets out on foot, even though it's 850 miles and 2 States away. His wife, sons try to tell him he really hasn't won anything, and that it's just a scam to get you to buy magazine subscriptions. However, Woody is determined and won't hear a word against it. His son, David, decides to just take him to Nebraska himself, just to please him. Kate, Woody's wife isn't pleased but lets them go. When David and Woody get laid up in a small town in Nebraska where Kate and Woody grew up, they have a get together with family for a few days. Woody, still thinking he's won a million, lets the "secret" out. Woody becomes small-town famous, and David learns many things about his father he never knew.

I've already said that I thought Nebraska looked pretty boring. But I was definitely wrong! Surprisingly, I really enjoyed this movie! I guess it shouldn't be too much of a surprise as I really enjoyed The Descendants a few years ago. However, I never enjoy movies about old people and was surprised I enjoyed this so much.

Nebraska had really dry, deadpan humor, which I love. And I felt this movie really captured a real-life snapshot of being living in small Midwest towns. While Descendants and Nebraska are the only 2 Alexander Payne films I've seen, I feel he really is able to capture real life in ways other movies don't do as well. Especially so with Nebraska. Between Woody saying he'd buy a new truck and an air compressor with his winnings, to just how average looking the cast was (in a good, realistic way!). While the film was kind of random, I liked it because real life isn't like the movies, and this really seemed to capture the randomness of life and getting old.

The acting was pretty great here. Bruce Dern was fantastic as Woody. He was constantly out of it, off in his own world until someone calls his name. He's a little naive, but he has Kate to make up for that. June Squibb was really hilarious as Kate. Crass and loud-talking, she was such a fun character and really had me in stitches a lot of the time. While I really didn't like the movie Amour because it was about old people dying, this movie was more about funny old people. And I have discovered old people being funny is like, extra funny.

As well, Will Forte did a fine job as David. He was the rock, the sane mind, and was always there for his dad, even when it seemed ridiculous.

Highlight scenes of the film include David and Woody looking for Woody's teeth by the railroad tracks, and David first fools his father when, upon finding his teeth, tells his father they aren't his. When his father gets told it's a joke, Woody plays the same one back, convincing David they're not his. As well, the scene where David and his brother go to steal the air compressor from Ed Pegram, with Woody and Kate in the backseat. I won't spoil it, but it was a really funny scene. Also, David's cousins teasing him that it took him 2 days to drive the 750 miles was too good.

Overall, this was a really good film, and I really enjoyed it. Should it win Best Picture? No, not at all, but I really did enjoy it. And it's movies like this that I'm glad are nominated because I would've definitely missed out on it if it hadn't been!

8/10

Patton

Patton, 1970
Directed by Franklin J. Schaffner
Nominated for 10 Oscars, Won 7
Wins Include: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor, Best Writing, Best Art/Set Direction, Best Sound, Best Film Editing

George S. Patton was a controversial and highly successful WWII commander. The film tells his story of his time in WWII. Basically, we see his progress through the war, his faults (temper and insubordination) and exactly how powerful he was despite those failings.

Patton was pretty much a jerk. I know he was quite successful during the war and made a lot of progress, not just for America, but for the Allies. But he was pretty much a jerk. Between his not believeing in posttraumatic stress syndrome (just calling the soldiers "weak"), and not doing what he was ordered so he could beat the British because he knew better. Those types of people, no matter how skilled they are, don't sit well with me.

The film itself didn't have much of a story to tell. It cuts in and out, assuming you know history very well, and recognize the names being dropped. Like, I've mentioned before, it's always helpful to have my history nerd of a husband to sit next to in films like these ones. Because often, I wasn't exactly sure how far along in the war we were, or what was going on.

Many of the problems I have, being a Canadian, is I find films like these way too "rah-rah America!" And this film was very much that way. Though, since they played that angle, I'm sure glad they didn't make Patton out to be a saint.

Of all the World War films to win, this one is probably my least favourite so far. This was a bit of a boring and irritating story to tell, and it didn't have a very strong narrative. Patton was far too irritating and egotistical for me to care about. Not quite sure if this was supposed to be the point, but it prevented me from enjoying the story. Though it didn't quite have much of a narrative anyway.

However, George C. Scott played Patton quite well. Everyone else seemed to be quite forgetable (though part of that was because they were standing next to Scott). However, aside from Scott, this film didn't do anything really spectacular. I mean, it looked great and everything, but I didn't find it to be that stand-out of a film.

Acting- 9/10 

Directing- 7/10 
Screenplay- 7/10 

Visuals- 8/10 

Music- 8.5/10 

Emotional Connection- 5.5/10 

Entertainment- 5/10 

Rewatchability- 3/10 

Overall Enjoyment- 5.5/10 

Overall Package- 7/10       

Total: 65.5/100

Philomena + Blue Jasmine

So I watched both Philomena and Blue Jasmine within the past week and a half, so I thought I'd just do small, quickie reviews for both of these

Philomena
Directed by Stephen Frears
Nominated for 4 Oscars, Including Best Picture

Philomena got pregnant while still a teenager. Her father, ashamed, left her at an abbey to live upon finding out. A few years after the baby was born, she was forced to give her son Anthony up for adoption, with no information on where he went, or who his parents are. 50 years later, Philomena meets up with a journalist who, recently let go, decides to write a piece about her and her son. The two, together, go on a journey to find Anthony, and uncover many secrets, about both the nuns, the abbey and Anthony himself.

I really like British films. And I like PG-13 films. I know some of the best all-time movies are really harsh and R-rated, but I do love PG-13 British Films. I like the dry humor in them, and the quirkiness. Philomena was definitely a very British film, and for that, I cannot fault it. It's not everyone's taste, but I enjoyed how the film was done.

Judi Dench was fantastic as quirky little Philomena, and Steve Coogan gave a fun and sometimes dark performance for Martin. While I know this is a true story, it seems the film was more or less faithful to the truth, which is always nice. And it took some twists and turns I didn't quite expect, and the trailer didn't give away. And while I felt there was not as much as closure of Philomena and Martin's battling about God, I do respect how they ended it and realize closure doesn't always happen in real life.

Should the film win Best Picture? No, not really, but it was a delightful, if sometimes dark and slightly disturbing, and that in itself was great.

7.5/10

Blue Jasmine
Directed by Woody Allen
Nominated for 3 Oscars, including Best Actress

Jasmine French used to have it all. Until she found out her husband was a crook, and moves to San Francisco to start fresh with her estranged and poorer sister. Battling between trying to adjust to her new life, and trying to make a comeback into the privileges she was used to, Jasmine is overwhelmed by her past, and isn't quite sure how to move forward.

First off, Cate Blanchett was impeccable casting, and her performance as Jasmine French is brilliant. I really mean it, she was really, really great. Jasmine is so messed up by what's happened to her, and Blanchett so easily was able to weave her rational and composure into her madness. Sally Hawkins gets a shout out for also being quite good, and for really holding her ground against Cate.

The subtleties of the film is probably what really makes it great (apart from Blanchett). Jasmine has lost everything but still has very nice close. Though if you watch the film, she doesn't have very many nice clothes. She has a jacket she wears several times, as well as a cardigan and a dress. All worn several times, which is subtle but speaks a lot about Jasmine. She still wants to put on the appearance of grandeur.

Watching Jasmine trying to muddle through everything and figure out her life is hard to watch. She's someone you want to kick in the pants and tell her to stop lying, to move on, and to take what she can get. Life is hard, which is something she didn't realize before now, it seems.

Overall, Cate Blanchett absolutely deserves to win, but does it deserve to win much else? Probably not

7/10

Oscar Nominations

Below are the Academy Award Nominations for 2014. See below to see nominees and how well I did with my predictions!

Grand Hotel

Grand Hotel, 1932
Directed by Edmund Goulding
Nominated for 1 Oscar, Won 1 Oscar

Grand Hotel is the story of several different characters. We start off with Otto Kringelein, who arrives at the luxurious Grand Hotel in Berlin. He is terminally ill and is bent on living his last days with style. He meets Baron Felix von Geigern, who befriends him. The Baron, we learn, is broke, and is making his "living" off card games, and occasionally as a jewel thief. His latest mission is to steal the pearls from Grusinskaya, a Russian ballerina staying in the hotel while in town. But instead, the two fall in love. Meanwhile, the Baron is also sort of seeing Flaemnchen, a sternographer who is doing some dictating for Kringelein's old boss. Everything intertwines together, and, as said at the end of the film "People come and people go. Nothing ever happens". 

Final Oscar Nominee Predictions

With the Oscar nominations coming out tomorrow morning, I thought I'd do an official write-up of all my nominee predictions. I haven't seen tons of the films this year, but I thought I'd take a shot at it and see how well I do. Last year I got 69/97 nominees correct (70%), and the year before I got 64/91 correct. I'm hoping to best last year with at least 75%! Though we'll see how that goes.

Best Picture
12 Years a Slave
American Hustle
Gravity
Nebraska
Captain Phillips

Her (6th choice)
The Wolf of Wall Street (7th choice)
Dallas Buyers Club (8th Choice)
Saving Mr Banks (9th choice)
Philomena (10th choice)

Spoiler Nominee: Inside Llewyn Davis

After the top 5, I'm really unsure of positions to put these in. Her is definitely my 6th choice, but Wolf of Wall Street, Dallas Buyers Club, and Saving Mr Banks could all swap positions. However, I feel like Banks has faded a bit, while Dallas Buyers is on the climb. Wolf is Scorsese helmed, and the Academy does love him.

Best Director
Steve McQueen- 12 Years a Slave
Alfonso Cuaron- Gravity
David O. Russell- American Hustle
Spike Jonze- Her
Martin Scorsese- The Wolf of Wall Street

Again, after McQueen, Cuaron and Russell, I'm not sure who the last 2 spots could go to. There are several to choose from (including the mentioned Jonze and Scorsese) with Paul Greengrass, Alexander Payne and The Coen Brothers. However, I'm going to take a bit of a risk with Jonze and Scorsese on this one.

Best Actor
Chiwetel Ejiofor- 12 Years a Slave
Matthew McConaughey- Dallas Buyers Club
Tom Hanks- Captain Phillips
Bruce Dern- Nebraska
Leonardo DiCaprio- The Wolf of Wall Street

I'm really split on whether the Academy will pick Redford or DiCaprio. But it's been a while since they've nominated DiCaprio, and with his win at the Globes, I'm going to do with DiCaprio. I know I'll probably regret this tomorrow, but Redford has disappeared from much of the talk these days so either choice is a risk.

Best Actress
Cate Blanchett- Blue Jasmine
Sandra Bullock- Gravity
Judi Dench- Philomena
Emma Thompson- Saving Mr Banks
Amy Adams- American Hustle

As much as people love Meryl Streep, I don't think she'll be included this year. While her performance in a mediocrely reviewed film hasn't stopped her before, I think there's just too much to offer here this year and she'll be left out. Then again, Emma Thompson or Amy Adams could be the ones left out this year.

Best Supporting Actor
Jared Leto- Dallas Buyers Club
Michael Fassbender- 12 Years a Slave
Barkhad Abdi- Captain Phillips
Daniel Bruhl- Rush
Bradley Cooper- American Hustle

While Adams and Cooper both didn't make the SAG awards, I can't imagine Jennifer Lawrence being the only nominee for the film. The Academy loves to honor O Russell performances, so I think Cooper will also be included here, along with Adams.

Best Supporting Actress
Lupita Nyong'o- 12 Years a Slave
Jennifer Lawrence- American Hustle
June Squibb- Nebraska
Oprah Winfrey- Lee Daniel's The Butler
Julia Roberts- August: Osage County

I've become increasinly unsure about nailing down the 5 nominees for all the acting categories. Each seem to have 2-3 locks, and then a few open spaces that have been divided. However, I'll stick with this list.

Adapted Screenplay
12 Years a Slave
The Wolf of Wall Street
Captain Phillips
Philomena
Before Midnight

I feel pretty confident with these ones, as there is a lot more Original Screenplays this year, and these seem to be pretty safe bets.

Original Screenplay
American Hustle
Her
Inside Llewyn Davis
Blue Jasmine
Nebraska

I wish I could completely write-off American Hustle here. I felt it was weak, and definitely not worthy of a nomination. However, I have a feeling the Academy will have some strong support for it, so it'll make the cut here. Here's to hoping that any other of the nominees wins in the end.

Best Animated Feature Film
Frozen
Monsters University
Despicable Me 2
The Croods
The Wind Rises

I personally really enjoyed Monsters University and Despicable Me 2, so I'm hoping they make the cut. The obvious winner here is Frozen

Best Film Editing
American Hustle
12 Years a Slave
Captain Phillips
Gravity
Rush

I'm going to take a chance here and pick Rush. I've heard wonderful things about it's editing, and think it could snag a spot. Spoiler nominee's include The Wolf of Wall Street and Her.

Best Cinematography
Prisoners
12 Years a Slave
Gravity
Inside Llewyn Davis
Nebraska

I feel pretty good about these ones, but Her, Captain Phillips, and the Grandmaster could play spoiler

Best Production Design
12 Years a Slave
The Great Gatsby
Her
Inside Llewyn Davis
American Hustle

All very different films, but I feel these all at least have a shot here, but could definitely be spoiled by other less accoladed-films.

Best Costume Design
12 Years a Slave
American Hustle
The Great Gatsby
The Invisible Woman
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

I've always thought the Hunger Games did so well with costumes and makeup, so I'm going to take a bit of a risk here and pick it.

Best Makeup & Hairstyling
American Hustle
The Lone Ranger
Dallas Buyer's Club

All I know is American Hustle will make it in here. I'm also crossing my fingers that The Hunger Games: Catching Fire makes it in here rather than the Lone Ranger

Best Original Score
12 Years a Slave- Hans Zimmer
Gravity- Steven Price
The Book Thief- John Williams
Saving Mr Banks- Thomas Newman
Alexander Ebert- All is Lost

I'm very unsure over this one. Newman, Williams scores don't seem to be overly fantastic, though I'm not sure what else I would swap. It hasn't really been a year for great scores.

Best Original Song
Let it Go- Frozen
Ordinary Love- Madela: Long Walk to Freedom
Young and Beautiful- The Great Gatsby
The Moon Song- Her
In the Middle of the Night- The Butler

I'm not even going to try and say I know anything about this category. I really could care less.

Best Visual Effects
Gravity
The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug
Pacific Rim
Iron Man 3
Oblivion

Of these, I've seen Gravity, Iron Man 3, Oblivion, and a little less than half of Pacific Rim. They all had great special effects. And if Gravity weren't the completely obvious winner here, I'd root for Oblivion (the effects were the best part of the film)

Best Sound Mixing
Gravity
Captain Phillips
Rush
Inside Llewyn Davis
Lone Survivor

Best Sound Editing
Gravity
Captain Phillips
Lone Survivor
Rush
All Is Lost

While I don't know much about the sound categories, I know Gravity is a pretty sure bet for both, and I've hear that Captain Phillips is too. Also, I feel All is Lost could go the Drive route, and only be nominated for Sound Editing. However, we'll see on that one.



Well, there you have it! I've predicted the top nominee being 12 Years a Slave with 11 Nominations, closely followed by American Hustle (10) and Gravity (9)

Good luck everyone!

American Hustle

American Hustle, 2013
Directed by David O. Russell

American Hustle is based upon ABSCAM, a scandal and con that took place in the 1970's. Loosely based on those facts, we get the story of Irving Rosenfeld, Sydney Prosser and Richie DiMasso. Irving is a brilliant conman and when he meets Sydney Prosser at a party, a girl who is trying to find herself, they fall in love and start up a con business together. They are a loan business, and when they get caught by Richie DiMasso, an FBI agent, they are given a deal. If they perform four more "busts" for the FBI, they can walk. At first Irving and Sydney (known as Lady Edith Greensley to DiMasso) are hesitant, but then agree to do business. DiMasso, it turns out, wants in way too big. Pushing to entrap politicians and getting involved with the mob, Irving feels they've gone in way too deep. But it could be Irving's crazy wife Rosalyn who brings the busts crashing down with her talking to anyone and everyone, and not knowing all the details.

This film is one that blogger and Oscar predictors have had on their radar since it was announced, getting ever so excited with the cast, and the trailers. However, despite the amazing cast Russell put together, and his success with Silver Linings Playbook last year, this was never a film that really caught my interest. The synopsis I always found vague, as did the trailers. I never really knew what the film was about, and I started to wonder if it was really about anything.

Upon watching the film just before Christmas, I found that it still wasn't about very much. Sure, the film had an objective that was easy enough. The conmen/women need to make 4 busts for the FBI and they can walk. And yes, that did happen. But the story still felt rather vague, and never as well explained as it could have been.

While I found the screenplay extremely weak, it made up for it in it's performances. Amy Adams, Christian Bale and Bradley Cooper are our three main players. Amy Adams, always charming in her roles, was sly and tricky. We never really knew where she was going or what she was thinking. And never quite knew if she even knew herself. Christian Bale, a little less harder to read, was openly uneasy about the whole operation, but was determinedly in love with Sydney. Bale is always so committed to his roles, and this is no differences. The weight, the hair, everything. Bradley Cooper, who surprised me with his acting chops last year, did another great job. Cooper seems to flourish playing the neurotic character, and again he is given a slightly more stable, though still neurotic role. He is desperate for fame and for power, and willing to do anything, and go way too far to achieve it.

As well we have Jeremy Renner, playing Carmine Polito, the enthusiastic and well-loved Mayor of Camden, NJ. He is a genuinely nice guy, who would do anything for his city. And last, we have Jennifer Lawrence, playing Irving's young and beautiful wife Rosalyn.

Personally, I felt Jennifer Lawrence was one of the best parts of the film. I know many people felt that (again) she was miscast and was way too young for the role before the film had come out. However, I felt Jennifer Lawrence was perfect for the role, and was such a riot. As wonderful as she is doing drama, she is equally as good in comedy, and this was her place to shine in that. Her part was small, and I know I could've used more of her as she always had me laughing.

The film was fun and you never really knew who was conning who anymore, but this movie felt too weak to win any major awards at this years Oscars. It was fun, and the costumes and hair were fantsticly horrible (in a good way). It was a character based film, but had Russell maybe taken more time with the screenplay and released it this year, it may've been a much stronger movie. The performances were fantastic, but it wasn't enough for me. Perhaps a second viewing will change my mind.

However, expect to see this up for Best Picture, Best Original Screenplay, Best Supporting Actress, Best Costume, Best Film Editing and Best Makeup and Hairstyling. Other possibilities include: Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor, Best Director.

7.5/10

Dances With Wolves

Dances With Wolves, 1990
Directed by Kevin Costner
Nominated for 12 Oscars, Won 7
Wins Include: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Cinematography, Best Sound, Best Film Editing, Best Original Score.

Dances With Wolves takes place in Civil War America. Lt. John Dunbar becomes an accidental hero when, choosing suicide over leg amputation, rides his horse up the Confederate Front line, which distracts them and leads the Union Army to winning battle. Dunbar survives, is allowed to keep his leg (which indeed recovers properly) and is given his choice of posting. He requests the Western Frontier so he can see it "before it disappears". He is sent to Fort Sedgewick, but finds it abandoned and in bad shape. While devouting himself to fixing it so he can prepare for the troops to be stationed there, he discovers a tribe of Sioux Indians not far away, as well as a lonely but timid wolf who stays nearby. He quickly becomes friends with the Indian tribe and finds himself getting drawn farther and farther into its lifestyle and culture, while possibly falling in love with the white woman (who was taken in by the tribe as a young girl) who is his only link to communicating with the tribe.

I have never really heard wonderful things about Dances With Wolves. Reading the back of the DVD, it sounded extremely similar to dozens of other movies including Pocahontas and Avatar (among others). I was always disappointed to see it was three hours long, and didn't look overly interesting. I mean, Avatar was pretty good but it didn't need to be nearly as long as it was. As well, I expected this to be an extremely naive story and be terrible with historical accuracy.

I was encouraged to find that the 3 hours weren't so terribly dragged out. It moved at a pretty good pace, even if there wasn't much of  a story. It wasn't terribly inaccurate, and upon reading, there was not much controversy around the content.

Personally, I found the movie moderately enjoyable. It's a story I've heard countless times in movies and books, but it was nevertheless a decent story. I found Dunbar falling in love with the community and the people of the tribe to be quite beautiful. However, am I the only one in thinking the story would've been better without the love story? To me, it would feel almost more impactful had there been no woman, no wife. That he was simply determined to return to "his people", to protect them, and that he fell in love with them, just them, instead of them plus the woman/his wife.

The cinematography is, what I think, the movie did best of all. It really captured the American Frontier in all it's beauty and desolation. The shots of the buffalo heard were incredible. As well, the buffalo hunting scene was beautiful, especially after learning that there was very little CGI/animatronics and most of it was shot was an actual large heard of buffalo. It was shot incredibly well.

The acting was fine, though nothing spectacular. As well with the screenplay.

Like Mel Gibson in Braveheart, Kevin Costner didn't seem like the best choice for Dunbar. When lacking the facial hair, he looked too modern to be a believable Civil War soldier. Even with the facial hair, he didn't look quite right. The acting was very subpar, and I felt someone else may've been a better choice.  

Was this a good movie? Meh, it was okay. Should it have won Best Picture? Probably not. Especially over a classic like Goodfellas. Granted, I haven't actually seen Goodfellas, but I know it is a mobster classic, and is considered one of (if not #1) Martin Scorsese's best films.

This felt a lot like the "safer choice" of that year. While it was an alright film, it was certainly not deserving of anything more than a cinematography or costume award.

Acting- 7/10     
Directing- 7/10     
Screenplay- 6.5/10     
Music – 8.5/10    
Visuals- 9/10     
Captivation- 6/10    
Emotional Connection- 6/10     
Rewatchability- 6/10     
Overall Enjoyment- 7.5/10     
Overall Package- 7/10      

Total: 70.5/100